<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:55:19 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>PāNu Blog - Comments</title><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>guzolany comments on 12 Steps update Mar 2010</title><author>guzolany</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:49:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/12-steps-update-mar-2010.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7756134</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>It could perhaps be advisable to refrain from recommending cod liver oil any longer - see this newsletter over there at the Vitamin-D-Council:</p>

<p>http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/newsletter/vitamin-d-vitamin-a-and-cancer.shtml</p>

<p>Cheers, guzolany</p>


<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>:</p>

<p>My <span class="caps">CLO </span>has 850 IU of A per teaspoon. That is about 17% of the US <span class="caps">RDA.</span> I average one teaspoon a day.</p>

<p>Unless you are trying to get vitamin D by taking 50 ml of <span class="caps">CLO </span>a day, there should be no hazard to using <span class="caps">CLO </span>to get 1-2 g/day <span class="caps">EPA</span>/DHA, especially if you do not eat liver, as I don't.</p>

<p>Cheers</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Flampton comments on The argument against cereal grains II</title><author>Flampton</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:03:04 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/the-argument-against-cereal-grains-ii.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7755457</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kurt,  good stuff.  One thing I'd like to get into really quickly is the wholesale misunderstanding of ruminant nutrition.  If more people realized they are <span class="caps">NOT </span>feeding themselves with grasses the more people will understand why we need meat.  Ruminants do not digest grasses or seeds.  Bacteria and protozoa do.  Then the ruminant digests them. </p>

<p>That's why the o3 o6 ratio may be bad in grain fed meat but there is so little of it a dolop of <span class="caps">CLO </span>will put you back in balance.  See bacteria don't tend to like polyunsaturates and they work their ass off to saturate them.  Then when the bacteria(not the grass or grain) is digested by the ruminant those fatty acids are incorporated in the tissues.</p>

<p>So in summation ruminants are not truly herbivores...they would better be classified as microbiovores.</p>

<p>One of the bloggers really need to get into this.  You, Eades, Richard etc.  Ruminant nutrition is ultra important because it IS the basis of human nutrition.</p>

<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>: </p>

<p>Well a herbivore is an eater of plants. Both hindgut fermentation and foregut fermentation use bacteria. A ruminant is a foregut fermenter and it is foregut fermenters that have the ability to do the assembly and saturation, etc at more fundamental level. That is why they have better ratios than hindgut fermenters like pigs or horses, etc.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Brett comments on The argument against cereal grains II</title><author>Brett</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:26:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/the-argument-against-cereal-grains-ii.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7754350</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Doc - phenomenal site, thanks for the many great posts!</p>

<p>My question actually has to do with vasectomy.  Possibly a non sequitur, but I actually believe that it relates to the broader Paleo theme of addressing and minimizing causal factors driving systemic inflammation and autoimmune issues, so please hear me out (and since we’re discussing the sexual organs of plants here, it may be not quite so far off topic!).</p>

<p>I recently cancelled a scheduled procedure at the last minute.  I had no problem facing the procedure itself, or the potential post-operative risks.  What had started to really, deeply concern me was my research into the potential autoimmune effects of vasectomy.  To boil down my understanding of the issue:  in a healthy male the sperm never cross the body/testes barrier so are never exposed to the immune system; after a vasectomy and the eventual rupture of the epididymis, the sperm then become ‘visible’ to the body for the first time; since the body sees their protein as a foreign agent, it mounts an immune response to break down the sperm, which are eventually absorbed.  As a result, something like 70-80% of vasectomized men eventually show antibodies to their own sperm.</p>

<p>All well and good so far, but this gets to the point where I’m wondering if the dietary paradigm has any relevance.  As far as I can tell from a layman’s perspective, this is not unlike the process that takes place when wheat gluten enters the body.  The gluten protein is read as “other”, which triggers an immune response.  It seems pretty obvious that there is a dosage response – i.e. the higher and more sustained the gluten loads, the more likely an individual is to experience (or eventually develop) negative effects; likewise a reduction in dosage can be expected to ameliorate the adverse effects.  Sustained significant exposure to gluten = systemic inflammation and adverse autoimmune effects.</p>

<p>So could sustained exposure to sperm, which has been established to trigger an immune response in vasectomized males, potentially achieve the same effects as a high-gluten diet?  The urologist appeared quite sanguine about the body's adaptation to developing sperm antibodies - but wouldn't there be a dosage response here as well?  And wouldn't it potentially operate the same way as for gluten?  In other words, just because the body develops immunity and antibodies to deal with the "invader", it doesn't necessarily follow that the sustained presence of the invader is a good thing - not if the result is a continuous state of immune arousal.</p>

<p>Imagine my horror at contemplating the possibility, after spending two years eliminating all gluten and most Neolithic agents from my diet in an attempt to minimize systemic inflammation and avoid the many autoimmune-related diseases of civilization, that I could spend the rest of my life with a powerful inflammation generator permanently mounted on my body!</p>

<p>I realize this question doesn’t completely fall within the nutrition domain addressed in this blog, but the Paleo community in general – and this site in particular – seem to be the only sources reliably addressing the autoimmune/inflammatory foundations of so many modern diseases.  I’d love to hear whether you think there might be a valid analogy to be made, or if I'm way off base in my reasoning.  Thanks!</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Teddy comments on The argument against cereal grains II</title><author>Teddy</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/the-argument-against-cereal-grains-ii.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7752588</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I just read an article about how the researcher Patrick McGovern, who has studied the history of fermented beverages, believes that alcohol could have played as or more of a significant role in the human grain selection experiment than straight consumption.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Denise G comments on The argument against cereal grains II</title><author>Denise G</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:37:41 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/the-argument-against-cereal-grains-ii.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7752389</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Hannah! I can't wait to go food shopping today! I really loved all the tips you gave me. And I always enjoy reading your posts. </p>

<p>As much as I've always cooked a lot, before dipping into Panu, my dishes were mainly chicken, fish, turkey, stir fries, eggs, ground beef, every vegetable imaginable....with lots of olive oil of course (the typical "healthy" recommendations). I know little about beef tarrow, lard and organ meats. But I'm interested in learning. </p>

<p>Thanks again for taking the time. It sounds like you've been cooking this way for awhile. </p>

<p>Best wishes.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>O comments on 12 Steps update Mar 2010</title><author>O</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:01:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/12-steps-update-mar-2010.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7752314</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a fantastic website and blog.</p>

<p>I was concerned about your statement that chicken is "very heavy in <span class="caps">PUFA.</span>"  Looking up in the <span class="caps">USDA </span>database:</p>

<p>1oz Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat and skin, cooked, roasted contains 395mg of omega-6.<br />
1oz Chicken, broilers or fryers, thigh, meat and skin, cooked, roasted contains 837mg of omega-6.</p>

<p>My typical lunch with 6oz of chicken therefore contains a max of about 5g of omega-6.  While certainly higher than beef or lamb, the amount does not strike me as high enough to warrant avoiding chicken thighs and chicken skin.  Compare, for example, to 1oz of almonds which contains 3.5g of omega-6, or 1oz of walnuts with 10.6g omega-6.</p>

<p>To maximize the omega-3/omega-3 ratio, I eliminated the 2oz mixed nuts I was eating each day, supplement with 4g of fish oil a day, as well as eat fatty fish 4x a week.  Can you please comment?</p>

<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>:</p>

<p>5 g of n-6 is about 45 kcal - this would be 2% of total kcal on 2250 a day. 4 g fish oil about 36 kcal or 1.6% so you are already at 3.6% total calories from <span class="caps">PUFA.</span> As long as that is your total for the day, that is pretty good. Sounds like you might be hungry though.</p>

<p>Why take so much fish oil? If you are need that much to balance a bunch more n-6 that I do not know about, then you are almost certainly well above 4% total kcal from <span class="caps">PUFA.</span></p>
]]></description></item><item><title>ana comments on The argument against cereal grains II</title><author>ana</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:52:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/the-argument-against-cereal-grains-ii.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7752174</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>'KGH: </p>

<p>The current popularity of olive oil is a fad. I am not dismissing it as a food, I am just saying paying $10 for a bottle of is kind of stupid, and the reasons for its current popularity are unfounded.</p>

<p>As far as the "tonic" part, well there is a pretty long history of all manner of substances being considered "tonics".'</p>

<p>Yes, but in the case of this particular "substance" there are countless studies that clearly indicate its positive effects on blood pressure, inflammation and cholesterol to name just three things. (No need to point out the shaky foundations of the cholesterol-heart disease hypothesis - I am talking about how it increases <span class="caps">HDL </span>cholesterol, high levels of which have been strongly linked to lower risk of heart disease). <br />
 <br />
Whether $10 is too much to pay for a bottle depends on the size of the bottle :-)</p>

<p>While it is obvious that our diets should approximate the diets we evolved eating, surely it is not impossible that a naturally occurring fruit could provide certain health benefuis?</p>

<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>: </p>

<p>You already know what I think. Olive oil is not medicine and the <span class="caps">MUFA </span>in it is not fundamentally different from the <span class="caps">MUFA </span>in lard or beef fat. I do not agree that these supposed health effects are as well established as you claim.</p>

<p>And, no I don't believe there are magic fruit. Maybe magic eggs and butter, though.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Erik Cisler comments on 12 Steps update Mar 2010</title><author>Erik Cisler</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:10:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/12-steps-update-mar-2010.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7751644</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">TS,</span></p>

<p>Check out the Saturday morning farmer's market on Arizona in Santa Monica. Amazing pastured eggs from carnivorous hens (no soy, no corn) for $4.50 a dozen from Healthy Family Farms. They do the Beverly Hills market on Sundays, too.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>TS comments on 12 Steps update Mar 2010</title><author>TS</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:37:15 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/12-steps-update-mar-2010.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7750837</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Back to the chicken for a moment, Dr Harris.  What about the "free range, organic" eggs?  Inside the carton, it clearly says that these eggs are from chickens which have been raised on a  "vegetarian diet" of grains; eggs from pastured hens are a "no show" in Los Angeles, <span class="caps">CA. </span> What, then, can adjust the <span class="caps">PUFA</span>s consumed from eating these "vegetarian diet" eggs, a gulp of <span class="caps">CLO</span>?  I usually eat about four eggs a day now.  A solution, please.</p>

<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>: </p>

<p>Don't pay extra for eggs unless the chickens eat bugs. Chickens are not vegetarian and the free range organic eggs are almost always vegetarian. Even if they are factory eggs they still are not too bad, though. A gram of <span class="caps">DHA</span>/EPA a day should compensate.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Chuck O comments on 12 Steps update Mar 2010</title><author>Chuck O</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:09:56 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.paleonu.com/panu-weblog/2010/3/12/12-steps-update-mar-2010.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/7750597</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Doc....</p>

<p>Is it ok to roll with the fat off of grass pasture beef, bison and "other red meat" beasts? </p>

<p>How about wild turkey and other wildfowl?  I really beat up the local goose population in the fall and eat alot of goose jerky. </p>

<p>THanks!<br />
Don't forget to lift heavy things once and awhile!</p>
]]></description></item></channel></rss>